100 Examples of sentences containing the adjective "quasi judicial"
Definition
The term quasi-judicial refers to actions, processes, or entities that have some characteristics of a judicial proceeding or function, but are not fully judicial in nature. It typically involves decision-making that is binding, involves the evaluation of evidence, and may include the resolution of disputes, but it does not take place in a court of law. Quasi-judicial processes are often seen in administrative agencies or boards that have the authority to make decisions on regulatory matters.
Synonyms
- Semi-judicial
- Administrative
- Regulatory
- Arbitrative
- Adjudicative
Antonyms
- Non-judicial
- Legislative
- Executive
- Informal
- Advisory
Examples
- The quasi-judicial hearing allowed the agency to determine the outcome of the dispute.
- Many regulatory bodies operate under quasi-judicial rules.
- The quasi-judicial process was established to ensure fairness in administrative decisions.
- A quasi-judicial tribunal made the final determination on the environmental impact.
- The school board's decision-making process is often considered quasi-judicial.
- The quasi-judicial nature of the arbitration proceedings was evident in the detailed findings.
- She was appointed to a quasi-judicial role in the housing authority.
- Many states have quasi-judicial committees to handle disputes concerning public utilities.
- The quasi-judicial review was criticized for lacking transparency.
- In a quasi-judicial hearing, both parties are allowed to present evidence.
- The quasi-judicial panel reached a decision after reviewing the case thoroughly.
- His role is quasi-judicial, as he acts as both a mediator and a decision-maker.
- The quasi-judicial functions of the commission include issuing permits and licenses.
- An appeal from a quasi-judicial decision usually goes to a higher administrative body.
- The quasi-judicial review process provides a mechanism for oversight.
- Quasi-judicial decisions can sometimes be contested in court.
- The agency's quasi-judicial powers allow it to enforce regulations.
- They held a quasi-judicial hearing to address community concerns.
- The quasi-judicial nature of the process was designed to improve accountability.
- In a quasi-judicial setting, procedural fairness is paramount.
- The quasi-judicial review board will evaluate the new policy proposals.
- During the quasi-judicial proceedings, expert witnesses were called to testify.
- The quasi-judicial nature of the decision made it difficult to appeal.
- A quasi-judicial agency has the authority to impose penalties.
- The findings of the quasi-judicial panel were binding and enforceable.
- The quasi-judicial hearing was open to the public for transparency.
- Many professional licensing boards operate in a quasi-judicial capacity.
- The quasi-judicial nature of the review process ensures fairness and impartiality.
- The quasi-judicial decision sparked a debate among stakeholders.
- He was involved in a quasi-judicial role during the investigation.
- The quasi-judicial aspects of the process require strict adherence to the rules.
- The quasi-judicial authority to enforce regulations lies with the commission.
- The quasi-judicial system aims to resolve disputes without full court proceedings.
- The quasi-judicial process often includes public hearings.
- The quasi-judicial nature of the board's decisions adds to their legitimacy.
- The report was produced following a quasi-judicial inquiry.
- The quasi-judicial nature of the proceedings allows for a thorough examination of facts.
- Her role in the quasi-judicial committee was crucial to the outcome.
- The quasi-judicial decision-making process involves rigorous standards.
- The quasi-judicial review concluded that the allegations were unfounded.
- Quasi-judicial hearings often resemble court trials but lack full judicial authority.
- The quasi-judicial investigation revealed significant procedural flaws.
- They are tasked with making quasi-judicial determinations regarding claims.
- The quasi-judicial nature of the review enhances public trust in the agency.
- The quasi-judicial framework allows for flexibility in decision-making.
- The quasi-judicial adjudication process is a critical part of regulatory enforcement.
- An important aspect of quasi-judicial processes is the right to appeal.
- The quasi-judicial nature of the hearing ensured that all sides were heard.
- The quasi-judicial authority allows agencies to make binding decisions.
- The members of the quasi-judicial panel were carefully selected for their expertise.
- The quasi-judicial nature of the arbitration process is often beneficial for both parties.
- The quasi-judicial decision was met with mixed reactions from the public.
- They established a quasi-judicial framework to address the environmental concerns.
- The quasi-judicial proceedings were designed to expedite the resolution process.
- The quasi-judicial authority of the board is derived from state law.
- The quasi-judicial process allows for an impartial review of the evidence.
- A quasi-judicial inquiry may lead to formal recommendations.
- The quasi-judicial nature of the proceedings was essential for fairness.
- They are often seen as quasi-judicial entities with specific regulatory powers.
- The quasi-judicial nature of the hearings ensures that justice is served.
- The quasi-judicial review process requires adherence to established legal standards.
- The quasi-judicial decision was upheld on appeal.
- A quasi-judicial body can impose sanctions for non-compliance.
- The quasi-judicial nature of the tribunal allows for a more efficient resolution of disputes.
- The quasi-judicial framework is intended to protect public interests.
- The quasi-judicial inquiry revealed systemic issues within the organization.
- Many organizations rely on quasi-judicial processes to resolve conflicts.
- The quasi-judicial forum provided a platform for both sides to present their cases.
- The quasi-judicial nature of regulatory hearings is meant to ensure accountability.
- In many cases, quasi-judicial decisions can have far-reaching implications.
- The quasi-judicial nature of the arbitration process is often preferred by businesses.
- The quasi-judicial committee was formed to enhance oversight of the process.
- The quasi-judicial nature of the proceedings was questioned by critics.
- The quasi-judicial authority granted to the agency allows it to function effectively.
- The quasi-judicial process is designed to resolve disputes efficiently.
- The quasi-judicial findings were made public to ensure transparency.
- The quasi-judicial nature of the hearing provided an opportunity for public comment.
- The quasi-judicial panel's decision was seen as a precedent for future cases.
- The quasi-judicial process can sometimes lead to unintended consequences.
- The quasi-judicial review found no evidence of wrongdoing.
- The quasi-judicial framework is essential for maintaining regulatory integrity.
- The quasi-judicial nature of the tribunal allowed for a thorough examination of the facts.
- The quasi-judicial authority enables agencies to enforce compliance with regulations.
- The quasi-judicial process is often more accessible than traditional court systems.
- The quasi-judicial hearings can be a crucial part of the regulatory process.
- The quasi-judicial nature of the inquiry ensures that all stakeholders are considered.
- The quasi-judicial functions of the commission are vital for public safety.
- The quasi-judicial review process is critical in maintaining fairness and equity.
- The quasi-judicial committee reached a unanimous decision regarding the policy changes.
- The quasi-judicial authority is designed to protect the rights of individuals.
- The quasi-judicial nature of the hearing helps to clarify misunderstandings.
- The quasi-judicial proceedings are governed by specific rules and regulations.
- The quasi-judicial decision prompted a review of existing policies.
- The quasi-judicial nature of the process is meant to enhance credibility.
- The quasi-judicial framework is essential for resolving regulatory disputes.
- The quasi-judicial authority allows for a balanced approach to enforcement.
- The quasi-judicial process ensures that all evidence is considered.
- The quasi-judicial committee is responsible for overseeing compliance issues.
- The quasi-judicial nature of the proceedings allows for expert testimony.
- The quasi-judicial findings will play a significant role in future regulations.