100 Examples of sentences containing the adverb "nominally"

Definition

The adverb nominally refers to something that is stated or named but not necessarily reflective of the reality or substance of the situation. It often indicates that a title, position, or role exists in name only, without significant authority or function.

1. In a formal or official capacity, often without actual power or effectiveness.
2. In terms of value or amount, often in a way that does not reflect true worth or significance.

Synonyms

• Ostensibly
• Allegedly
• Supposedly
• Theoretically
• In name only
• On paper

Antonyms

• Actually
• Truly
• Really
• Substantially
• Effectively

Examples

1. The project is nominally funded by the government.
2. He is nominally the team leader, but others make the decisions.
3. The company is nominally profitable, yet it struggles to pay its bills.
4. She holds a nominally prestigious title, but her influence is limited.
5. The organization is nominally a charity but operates more like a business.
6. The new law is nominally in effect, but enforcement is lax.
7. He is nominally in charge of the department, but his assistant runs the show.
8. The club is nominally exclusive, yet anyone can join.
9. The budget is nominally balanced, but many expenses are hidden.
10. She is nominally a consultant, but her role is more like an intern.
11. The project was nominally completed ahead of schedule, but quality was sacrificed.
12. The meeting was nominally about strategy, but it devolved into complaints.
13. They are nominally allies, but there is underlying tension.
14. The title of CEO is nominally impressive, but the board controls everything.
15. The report is nominally thorough, yet it lacks critical details.
16. He is nominally part of the team, but rarely contributes.
17. The rules are nominally enforced, but favoritism prevails.
18. They are nominally committed to sustainability, but actions tell a different story.
19. The program is nominally free, but hidden fees are numerous.
20. She is nominally in charge of the event, but the real organizer is her friend.
21. The policy is nominally supportive of workers, yet many feel abandoned.
22. The company is nominally a startup, but it has been in business for years.
23. His role is nominally that of a mentor, but he provides little guidance.
24. They are nominally partners, but one side does all the work.
25. The agreement is nominally binding, yet it lacks enforcement mechanisms.
26. The event is nominally for charity, but profits are significant.
27. The title of professor is nominally prestigious, but he is rarely present.
28. The initiative is nominally aimed at youth, yet few young people participate.
29. The film was nominally a success, but critiques were harsh.
30. The committee is nominally diverse, but few voices are heard.
31. The industry is nominally regulated, yet loopholes abound.
32. The service is nominally free, but donations are heavily encouraged.
33. The school is nominally inclusive, but many feel marginalized.
34. The deadline is nominally fixed, but extensions are common.
35. Their relationship is nominally professional, but there are personal ties.
36. The criteria are nominally objective, yet bias is evident.
37. The report is nominally comprehensive, but it ignores key issues.
38. The title is nominally significant, but it carries little weight in practice.
39. The organization is nominally democratic, yet decisions are made behind closed doors.
40. The position is nominally full-time, but hours are often cut.
41. The event was nominally educational, but entertainment was prioritized.
42. The partnership is nominally equal, but one party dominates.
43. The funding is nominally secure, but actual resources are lacking.
44. The laws are nominally protective, yet enforcement is minimal.
45. The campaign is nominally grassroots, but corporate sponsorship is prominent.
46. The policy is nominally progressive, but implementation is slow.
47. The festival is nominally cultural, but commercial interests take precedence.
48. The group is nominally united, but internal conflicts are rampant.
49. The initiative is nominally aimed at reform, yet status quo remains.
50. The position is nominally important, but it lacks real responsibility.
51. The guidelines are nominally clear, yet confusion persists.
52. The initiative is nominally supported by management, but funding is lacking.
53. The organization is nominally international, but participation is limited.
54. The committee is nominally diverse, but decisions favor a single perspective.
55. The campaign is nominally inclusive, but many feel excluded.
56. The project is nominally collaborative, yet communication is poor.
57. The analysis is nominally thorough, but key factors are overlooked.
58. The title is nominally impressive, but responsibilities are minimal.
59. The organization is nominally volunteer-based, yet most work is unpaid.
60. The effort is nominally a community service, but benefits are skewed.
61. The proposal is nominally innovative, yet it mirrors previous ideas.
62. The strategy is nominally effective, but results are lacking.
63. The curriculum is nominally updated, but it remains outdated.
64. The job is nominally full-time, but hours are often cut.
65. The partnership is nominally equitable, but one side reaps the benefits.
66. The event is nominally for students, but it caters to faculty.
67. The guidelines are nominally enforced, but violations are common.
68. The team is nominally collaborative, but competition is fierce.
69. The initiative is nominally sustainable, yet practices are harmful.
70. The project is nominally funded, but resources are scarce.
71. The report is nominally accurate, but it contains many errors.
72. The agreement is nominally binding, but loopholes exist.
73. The organization is nominally a nonprofit, yet profits are immense.
74. The meeting is nominally productive, but little is accomplished.
75. The position is nominally important, but few take it seriously.
76. The policy is nominally inclusive, yet many feel alienated.
77. The title is nominally significant, but it lacks authority.
78. The service is nominally available, but access is limited.
79. The funding is nominally secure, but actual resources are dwindling.
80. The event is nominally educational, but entertainment overshadows learning.
81. The criteria are nominally transparent, yet bias is evident.
82. The relationship is nominally professional, but personal ties complicate matters.
83. The curriculum is nominally modern, but it fails to engage students.
84. The project is nominally collaborative, but few contribute equally.
85. The team is nominally united, but fractures exist.
86. The report is nominally comprehensive, yet it lacks depth.
87. The deadline is nominally fixed, but extensions are common.
88. The partnership is nominally balanced, but one party dominates.
89. The initiative is nominally aimed at reform, yet little changes.
90. The policies are nominally fair, but implementation is flawed.
91. The title is nominally impressive, but it carries little weight.
92. The guidelines are nominally clear, yet confusion reigns.
93. The organization is nominally inclusive, but many feel left out.
94. The project is nominally funded, but support is minimal.
95. The event is nominally for charity, but profits are significant.
96. The analysis is nominally thorough, but key factors are ignored.
97. The committee is nominally diverse, but perspectives are limited.
98. The campaign is nominally grassroots, but corporate interests prevail.
99. The strategy is nominally effective, but results are lacking.
100. The group is nominally united, but internal conflicts persist.