100 Examples of sentences containing the common noun "abrogation"
Definition
Abrogation is a noun that refers to the formal repeal or abolition of a law, regulation, or agreement. It can also signify the act of nullifying or rescinding something, often in a legal or authoritative context.
Synonyms
- Repeal
- Abolition
- Revocation
- Rescission
- Nullification
- Cancellation
- Annulment
- Termination
Antonyms
- Enactment
- Establishment
- Confirmation
- Ratification
- Continuation
- Maintenance
- Upholding
Examples
- The abrogation of the outdated law was celebrated by many activists.
- The government announced the abrogation of the controversial treaty.
- Legal experts debated the implications of the abrogation of civil rights protections.
- The abrogation of the agreement left both parties in a difficult position.
- Many citizens protested against the abrogation of their rights.
- The abrogation of the trade deal affected numerous industries.
- There was a swift abrogation of policies that no longer served the public interest.
- The abrogation of previous regulations was necessary for modernization.
- Activists called for the abrogation of laws that discriminated against minorities.
- The abrogation process took longer than anticipated due to legal challenges.
- The abrogation of the contract was a complicated legal matter.
- After the abrogation, many people were uncertain about their future.
- The abrogation was met with mixed reactions from the community.
- The abrogation of the policy aimed to foster inclusivity.
- Following the abrogation, new guidelines were introduced to fill the gap.
- The abrogation of regulations often leads to increased business freedom.
- The abrogation sparked a nationwide debate about governance.
- The council voted unanimously for the abrogation of the outdated rule.
- The abrogation of the law was a pivotal moment in the movement for reform.
- Legal challenges arose immediately after the abrogation was announced.
- The abrogation of the existing framework was deemed essential for progress.
- With the abrogation of the statute, many felt a renewed sense of hope.
- The abrogation came after years of lobbying from various interest groups.
- The abrogation of the policy raised questions about future governance.
- The abrogation process was lengthy and involved numerous stakeholders.
- The abrogation of the rule was celebrated as a victory for human rights.
- The abrogation triggered a wave of protests across the nation.
- Many officials supported the abrogation to advance social justice.
- The abrogation of the law was seen as a necessary step towards equality.
- The abrogation led to the drafting of a new legislative proposal.
- The abrogation of the agreement resulted in increased tensions between the nations.
- After the abrogation, citizens were encouraged to voice their opinions.
- The abrogation was widely covered in the news media.
- The abrogation process required careful consideration of all implications.
- Following the abrogation, many citizens felt a sense of relief.
- The abrogation was formalized through a parliamentary vote.
- The abrogation of the treaty was a historical turning point.
- The abrogation aimed to address longstanding grievances.
- The abrogation did not come without controversy.
- The abrogation was influenced by changes in public sentiment.
- The abrogation of the statute opened the door for new legislation.
- The abrogation was a key demand of the protestors.
- Following the abrogation, discussions about alternatives began.
- The abrogation was a response to mounting pressure from advocacy groups.
- The abrogation marked a significant shift in policy direction.
- The abrogation faced opposition from various sectors of society.
- The abrogation was intended to simplify the legal framework.
- Many were relieved by the abrogation of the restrictive measures.
- The abrogation sparked a reassessment of existing laws.
- The abrogation process included multiple hearings and consultations.
- The abrogation was seen as a victory for democracy.
- The abrogation of the policy was met with applause from supporters.
- The abrogation led to a reevaluation of priorities in governance.
- The abrogation was finalized after extensive negotiations.
- The abrogation was documented in the official records.
- The abrogation had a profound impact on the community.
- The abrogation was a critical step towards reform.
- The abrogation of the law was influenced by international standards.
- The abrogation prompted a review of related legislation.
- The abrogation was celebrated as a triumph of justice.
- Following the abrogation, many laws were reexamined.
- The abrogation received bipartisan support.
- The abrogation of the regulation was anticipated by many stakeholders.
- The abrogation was a topic of discussion at the conference.
- The abrogation was deemed necessary for compliance with new regulations.
- The abrogation led to a significant overhaul of the legal system.
- The abrogation was necessary to align with changing societal values.
- The abrogation of the policy resulted in immediate changes.
- The abrogation was a historic moment for the legislative body.
- The abrogation was celebrated with a public rally.
- The abrogation process required careful legal analysis.
- Many citizens supported the abrogation due to its implications for freedom.
- The abrogation was guided by principles of equity and justice.
- The abrogation raised questions about future governance.
- The abrogation was officially enacted last month.
- The abrogation of the law was met with cheers from the crowd.
- The abrogation was an important milestone in the campaign for rights.
- The abrogation of the statute was a long-awaited change.
- The abrogation was part of a larger reform agenda.
- The abrogation of the agreement was a strategic decision.
- The abrogation sparked discussions about legislative priorities.
- The abrogation of the law was followed by a series of reforms.
- The abrogation highlighted the need for modernizing outdated laws.
- Following the abrogation, there was a surge in public engagement.
- The abrogation was a response to the evolving social landscape.
- The abrogation was seen as a necessary corrective measure.
- The abrogation was enacted to improve public safety.
- The abrogation had wide-ranging effects on the community.
- The abrogation of the policy was anticipated by many.
- The abrogation was a focal point of the political debate.
- The abrogation of the treaty was a complex process.
- The abrogation was a response to changing economic conditions.
- The abrogation was supported by many influential leaders.
- The abrogation led to the establishment of new norms.
- The abrogation was a turning point in the legislative history of the state.
- The abrogation was necessary to prevent further injustices.
- The abrogation of the law was celebrated as a victory for civil liberties.
- The abrogation was a subject of great interest in legal circles.
- The abrogation was viewed as a necessary step towards progress.
- The abrogation of the outdated regulation was met with relief from the public.