100 Examples of sentences containing the common noun "injunction"

Definition

An injunction is a legal order issued by a court that requires an individual or entity to do or refrain from doing a specific action. It is often used to prevent harm or to maintain the status quo in legal disputes.

Synonyms

• Court order
• Restraining order
• Prohibition
• Mandate
• Directive

Antonyms

• Permission
• Approval
• Allowance
• Consent
• Authorization

Examples

1. The court issued an injunction to prevent the company from polluting the river.
2. She sought an injunction against her neighbor for playing loud music at night.
3. The judge granted the injunction to stop the construction until further notice.
4. The injunction prevented the sale of the property until the legal issues were resolved.
5. After several hearings, the injunction was finally lifted by the court.
6. The injunction forced the defendant to cease all operations at the site.
7. A temporary injunction was placed on the use of the trademark.
8. The environmental group filed an injunction to protect the endangered species.
9. The injunction halted the execution of the new law.
10. His attorney filed an injunction seeking to protect his client's rights.
11. The injunction restricted the use of certain chemicals in the manufacturing process.
12. Following the injunction, the company revised its policies.
13. The injunction ordered the parties to engage in mediation.
14. The school received an injunction related to a student’s expulsion.
15. The injunction stopped the protests from occurring in the designated area.
16. She was granted an injunction that prohibited her ex-partner from contacting her.
17. The injunction overturned previous decisions made by the lower court.
18. They filed an injunction to challenge the legality of the new regulation.
19. The injunction ensured that the rights of the workers were protected.
20. The injunction blocked the merger until further investigations were completed.
21. A federal injunction was issued to protect the rights of the plaintiffs.
22. The injunction prevented any changes to the contract until the case was resolved.
23. The community rallied for an injunction against the proposed factory.
24. The injunction mandated that all parties adhere to the original agreement.
25. The judge's injunction limited the scope of the project.
26. An injunction was sought to stop the release of confidential information.
27. The company complied with the injunction to avoid further penalties.
28. The injunction led to significant changes in corporate practices.
29. The legal team worked tirelessly to secure the injunction.
30. The injunction established guidelines for future actions.
31. A successful injunction resulted in a temporary victory for the plaintiffs.
32. The injunction restricted access to the sensitive site.
33. The court's injunction provided a necessary pause in the proceedings.
34. The injunction highlighted the importance of environmental protections.
35. Appeals against the injunction were filed immediately.
36. The injunction was issued to protect public safety.
37. They argued that the injunction interfered with their business operations.
38. The judge’s injunction clarified the legal obligations of the parties involved.
39. The injunction was intended to prevent further harm.
40. A notable injunction changed the course of the legal battle.
41. The injunction enforced stricter regulations on the industry.
42. The plaintiff’s injunction received widespread media attention.
43. The injunction was filed in response to a breach of contract claim.
44. The injunction provided immediate relief to those affected.
45. The injunction addressed the violations of the environmental law.
46. Legal experts discussed the implications of the recent injunction.
47. The injunction allowed time for further investigation.
48. The community was relieved when the injunction was granted.
49. The injunction was essential for maintaining order during the protests.
50. The injunction stayed the enforcement of the new regulations.
51. The injunction was upheld by the appellate court.
52. The injunction was critical in safeguarding consumer rights.
53. They sought a permanent injunction to resolve the ongoing dispute.
54. The injunction resulted in the suspension of the event.
55. The injunction halted the development until a thorough review was completed.
56. The injunction was challenged on constitutional grounds.
57. A swift injunction ensured that the project could not proceed.
58. The injunction provided a framework for negotiations.
59. The ongoing case led to multiple injunctions being filed.
60. The injunction clarified the rights of the individuals involved.
61. The injunction was a significant step in the legal battle.
62. The injunction required the company to disclose all relevant documents.
63. The legal team was confident the injunction would be successful.
64. The injunction was a result of public outcry.
65. The injunction allowed for a review of the case before proceeding.
66. The injunction was designed to protect the interests of the community.
67. The injunction temporarily halted the construction project.
68. The parties involved were unhappy with the injunction.
69. The injunction was issued in response to a public health crisis.
70. The injunction prevented the enforcement of the policy.
71. The injunction was celebrated by activists.
72. The judge's decision to issue an injunction sparked controversy.
73. The injunction was upheld by the highest court.
74. They received an injunction that restricted their ability to operate.
75. The injunction was seen as a victory for the plaintiffs.
76. The injunction was crucial in the overall strategy of the legal team.
77. The injunction was sought to protect trade secrets.
78. The injunction imposed strict limitations on the defendant.
79. The injunction was part of a larger legal strategy.
80. The injunction was necessary to ensure compliance.
81. The injunction was a response to previous violations.
82. The injunction halted the process until a final decision was made.
83. An injunction was filed in hopes of stopping the harmful practice.
84. The injunction ensured that no further damage occurred.
85. The injunction was necessary to protect the public.
86. The injunction had significant ramifications for the industry.
87. The injunction was issued in a timely manner.
88. The injunction was part of a broader legal movement.
89. The injunction came as a surprise to many involved.
90. The injunction was instrumental in the case's outcome.
91. The injunction was contested by the opposing party.
92. The injunction was celebrated as a win for justice.
93. The injunction allowed for a pause in proceedings.
94. The injunction ensured that rights were preserved.
95. The injunction served to protect the vulnerable.
96. Legal counsel advised filing an injunction to secure rights.
97. The injunction was issued without delay.
98. The injunction was pivotal in shaping the legal landscape.
99. The injunction was a safeguard against further violations.
100. The parties were ordered to comply with the injunction immediately.