100 Examples of sentences containing the common noun "intervenor"

Definition

Intervenor (noun): An intervenor is an individual or entity that intervenes in a legal proceeding or dispute, typically to assert a right or interest that may be affected by the outcome of the case. Intervenors often seek to join an ongoing lawsuit to protect their interests or to contribute to the resolution of the matter at hand.

Synonyms

• Participant
• Mediator
• Contributor
• Stakeholder
• Third party

Antonyms

• Bystander
• Bystander
• Bystander
• Observer
• Non-participant

Examples

1. The intervenor in the case presented compelling evidence to support their claims.
2. As an intervenor, she was able to voice her concerns directly to the court.
3. The judge allowed the intervenor to join the proceedings due to their vested interest.
4. An intervenor can help clarify complex issues in a legal dispute.
5. The role of the intervenor is crucial in ensuring that all voices are heard.
6. Many intervenors filed motions to participate in the litigation.
7. The intervenor expressed dissatisfaction with the initial ruling.
8. As an intervenor, he was granted the right to appeal the decision.
9. The court considered the intervenor's arguments carefully before making a ruling.
10. Each intervenor was given a specific time to present their case.
11. The intervenor sought to protect environmental interests during the trial.
12. The rights of the intervenor must be respected throughout the process.
13. The intervenor played a pivotal role in negotiating a settlement.
14. An intervenor may be required to pay fees to join a lawsuit.
15. The intervenor was well-prepared for the hearing and presented strong points.
16. The judge acknowledged the need for an intervenor in the complex case.
17. The intervenor's participation changed the dynamics of the trial.
18. During the hearings, the intervenor raised significant legal questions.
19. As an intervenor, she was able to influence the final outcome.
20. The lawyer represented the intervenor with great diligence and expertise.
21. The intervenor filed a brief to outline their position on the matter.
22. A financial intervenor joined the case to discuss economic implications.
23. The intervenor was primarily concerned with the welfare of affected parties.
24. An intervenor must demonstrate a legitimate interest in the case.
25. The intervenor was allowed to submit additional evidence for consideration.
26. Each intervenor brought unique perspectives to the discussion.
27. The intervenor’s testimony proved to be crucial for the case's resolution.
28. The judge requested the intervenor to clarify their stance on the issue.
29. The intervenor was praised for their thorough preparation.
30. As a legal intervenor, they had the responsibility to uphold justice.
31. The intervenor’s involvement was seen as beneficial to all parties.
32. The court's ruling favored the intervenor’s position.
33. An intervenor can sometimes lead to delays in legal proceedings.
34. The intervenor articulated their views compellingly in court.
35. The presence of an intervenor often enriches the legal dialogue.
36. The intervenor was granted full access to the case files.
37. The intervenor's arguments were well-received by the jury.
38. As an intervenor, he had to meet specific legal criteria.
39. The intervenor contributed to a more comprehensive understanding of the case.
40. The intervenor was motivated by a desire to advocate for justice.
41. The court recognized the intervenor as an essential part of the proceedings.
42. The intervenor was allowed to cross-examine witnesses.
43. The intervenor filed for a motion to dismiss on several grounds.
44. The judge acknowledged the intervenor's right to participate.
45. The intervenor was a key player in the mediation process.
46. An intervenor can bring new evidence that may alter the case's outcome.
47. The intervenor's role was to balance competing interests.
48. The intervenor submitted a detailed report to the court.
49. The intervenor was instrumental in achieving a fair settlement.
50. The legal team prepared a strong case for the intervenor.
51. As an intervenor, she felt a deep responsibility to represent her community.
52. The intervenor's participation was welcomed by the other parties involved.
53. The court session included statements from the intervenor.
54. The intervenor was given ample opportunity to present their case.
55. The outcome hinged on the intervenor's arguments regarding the law.
56. The intervenor adhered to all procedural rules during the hearing.
57. The presence of an intervenor can sometimes complicate legal matters.
58. The intervenor provided insights that were previously overlooked.
59. The intervenor was determined to protect their legal rights.
60. The intervenor's contributions were acknowledged in the final decision.
61. The court allowed the intervenor to file an amicus brief.
62. As an intervenor, their focus was on the broader implications of the case.
63. The intervenor actively participated in discussions throughout the trial.
64. The intervenor faced challenges in proving their case.
65. The intervenor's motives were questioned during the proceedings.
66. The judge called upon the intervenor to clarify their position.
67. The intervenor's involvement was crucial for community representation.
68. The intervenor argued that their rights had been infringed.
69. The intervenor brought a unique perspective to the legal debate.
70. The court praised the intervenor for their constructive input.
71. The intervenor was able to sway the jury with their testimony.
72. The intervenor had to navigate complex legal procedures.
73. The intervenor was recognized for their dedication to the cause.
74. The intervenor's role is often defined by statute or regulation.
75. The intervenor ensured that all relevant evidence was considered.
76. The presence of an intervenor can enhance the fairness of the trial.
77. The intervenor quickly adapted to the courtroom environment.
78. The judge requested the intervenor to summarize their main points.
79. The intervenor had a significant impact on the legal landscape.
80. The intervenor was well-versed in the laws affecting the case.
81. The intervenor sought to influence public opinion on the matter.
82. As an intervenor, they took their responsibilities seriously.
83. The intervenor advocated for changes that would benefit the community.
84. The intervenor had a history of engaging in similar cases.
85. The judge ruled in favor of the intervenor's request.
86. The intervenor felt a moral obligation to participate.
87. The intervenor's arguments were clear and concise.
88. The intervenor demonstrated a thorough understanding of the law.
89. The intervenor was strategically positioned to influence the outcome.
90. The intervenor was able to articulate the needs of the affected parties.
91. The intervenor was committed to finding a resolution.
92. The court appreciated the intervenor's input during deliberations.
93. The intervenor was instrumental in shaping the final agreement.
94. The intervenor took great care in preparing their submissions to the court.
95. The intervenor respectfully challenged the opposing party's claims.
96. The intervenor was featured in several discussions surrounding the case.
97. The intervenor's presence signaled the importance of the issue.
98. The intervenor was determined to protect their interests.
99. The intervenor worked collaboratively with other stakeholders.
100. The intervenor was recognized for their significant contributions to the case.