100 Examples of sentences containing the common noun "juries"

Definition

Juries are groups of individuals, typically composed of citizens, who are sworn to render an impartial verdict in a legal case based on the evidence presented to them in a court of law. They play a crucial role in the judicial process by ensuring that the rights of the accused are upheld and that justice is served.

Synonyms

• Panel
• Tribunal
• Jury members
• Jury panel
• Deliberators

Antonyms

• Accusers
• Prosecutors
• Defendants
• Judges (in the context of decision-making roles)

Examples

1. The juries deliberated for several hours before reaching a verdict.
2. In high-profile cases, juries often face intense scrutiny from the media.
3. Many people are called to serve on juries each year.
4. The judge instructed the juries to remain impartial during the trial.
5. Historical records indicate that juries have evolved significantly over the centuries.
6. The juries listened carefully to the witness testimonies.
7. During the trial, the juries were shown critical evidence.
8. Different states have different rules governing how juries are selected.
9. The defense attorney emphasized the importance of the juries' role in the trial.
10. The verdict was delivered after the juries had reached a consensus.
11. In some jurisdictions, juries can be made up of just six members.
12. The tension in the courtroom was palpable as the juries returned with their decision.
13. Juries must weigh the evidence without bias.
14. The size of the juries varies depending on the type of case.
15. Sometimes juries are influenced by the emotional aspects of a trial.
16. The juries received instructions from the judge before starting their deliberations.
17. Members of the juries discussed the case in a private room.
18. The judge reminded the juries of their duty to uphold the law.
19. Juries often struggle with the complexities of certain cases.
20. The attorney addressed the juries directly during his closing arguments.
21. Juries have the power to acquit a defendant if they find reasonable doubt.
22. After weeks of testimony, the juries finally reached a verdict.
23. There are debates about whether juries should be composed of a diverse group.
24. The role of juries is fundamental to the justice system.
25. Juries are sometimes unable to agree on a verdict, resulting in a hung jury.
26. The prosecutor presented his case to the juries with confidence.
27. In civil cases, juries decide on damages awarded to plaintiffs.
28. The juries listened attentively as the final arguments were made.
29. Many feel that juries reflect the community’s values and beliefs.
30. The juries were comprised of individuals from various backgrounds.
31. It is essential for juries to remain unbiased throughout the trial.
32. The judge explained the law to the juries before they began deliberating.
33. The juries were instructed to consider only the evidence presented.
34. Some cases may require juries to consider complicated legal principles.
35. Juries often face challenges when interpreting conflicting testimonies.
36. The final decision relied heavily on how the juries perceived the evidence.
37. The juries were dismissed after reaching a unanimous verdict.
38. Many people feel honored to serve on juries.
39. The juries expressed their concerns about the length of the trial.
40. The defense team prepared thoroughly for the juries’ questions.
41. The juries were not allowed to discuss the case until deliberation.
42. Some people believe that technology can help juries make better decisions.
43. The juries had to consider the credibility of various witnesses.
44. The judge reminded the juries of their responsibility to the community.
45. Juries are crucial in ensuring a fair trial.
46. The nature of the crime made it difficult for the juries to decide.
47. The juries were presented with a wealth of evidence throughout the trial.
48. Juries must base their decisions solely on the evidence and testimony.
49. The dynamics within the juries can significantly impact the deliberation process.
50. After reviewing the evidence, the juries felt confident in their decision.
51. The juries found the defendant guilty on all counts.
52. Some juries choose to ask for clarification on legal terms during deliberation.
53. The juries were taken aback by the unexpected testimony.
54. Juries often reflect the demographic makeup of their communities.
55. The judge's instructions were critical for guiding the juries.
56. Juries have the power to influence the outcome of a trial significantly.
57. The juries summoned for the case were diverse in age and background.
58. The prosecutor's strategy was designed to appeal to the juries.
59. The juries were encouraged to speak freely during deliberation.
60. It is essential that juries act independently of outside influence.
61. The juries asked to review certain pieces of evidence again.
62. The outcome of the trial depended heavily on how the juries interpreted the facts.
63. Juries can be influenced by compelling storytelling during the trial.
64. The juries were asked to remain silent during the proceedings.
65. The role of juries is to ensure that justice is served fairly.
66. The judge warned the juries about discussing the case publicly.
67. The juries struggled with the complex legal arguments presented.
68. Each member of the juries brought their unique perspective to the deliberation.
69. The juries were tasked with determining the facts of the case.
70. The juries were instructed to focus only on the evidence presented.
71. Sometimes, juries have to make tough decisions that can affect lives.
72. The juries conveyed their decision through a written verdict.
73. Juries are a fundamental aspect of the judicial process in many countries.
74. The juries were chosen randomly from the population.
75. The juries expressed their frustration with the lengthy trial process.
76. The integrity of the juries is vital for a fair legal system.
77. In some cases, juries are allowed to ask questions of the witnesses.
78. The juries delivered their verdict after careful consideration.
79. The concept of juries dates back to ancient legal systems.
80. The juries are responsible for determining guilt or innocence.
81. The juries listened intently to the closing arguments from both sides.
82. Many believe that juries should reflect the community's demographics.
83. The juries were tasked with ensuring justice was served.
84. The juries were composed of twelve members, as is customary in many places.
85. Juries must remain impartial, regardless of personal beliefs.
86. The verdict was a surprise to many, including the juries themselves.
87. The juries were instructed to focus on the evidence only.
88. The juries had to navigate complex legal definitions during deliberation.
89. The integrity of the juries is paramount for upholding the law.
90. Juries are often seen as a representation of the community's conscience.
91. The juries were reminded of their duty to serve justice.
92. The judge allowed the juries to take breaks during lengthy sessions.
93. The juries were presented with conflicting evidence that complicated their decision.
94. Juries may consider character evidence when making their decision.
95. The juries were encouraged to discuss the case thoroughly.
96. The juries were given guidelines to help them reach a fair verdict.
97. The juries were impacted by the emotional testimonies presented.
98. The decision of the juries was met with mixed reactions from the public.
99. In some trials, juries are allowed to view the crime scene.
100. The juries emphasized the importance of weighing all evidence before making a decision.