100 Examples of sentences containing the common noun "objector"
Definition
An objector is a noun that refers to a person who expresses or feels disapproval or opposition to something, often in a formal context. This term is frequently used in legal, political, or ethical discussions.
Synonyms
- Opponent
- Protester
- Dissentient
- Disapprover
- Resister
- Challenger
Antonyms
- Supporter
- Proponent
- Advocate
- Endorser
- Approver
Examples
- The objector raised concerns during the town hall meeting.
- She was labeled as an objector after voicing her opposition to the new policy.
- The objector submitted a formal complaint regarding the proposed changes.
- As an objector, he felt compelled to speak out against injustice.
- The objector provided a compelling argument against the project.
- In court, the objector presented evidence to support their case.
- The objector was given a chance to express their views during the debate.
- His role as an objector led to significant changes in the legislation.
- The community had many objectors to the construction of the new building.
- The objector spoke passionately about the impact of the decision on local wildlife.
- During the meeting, every objector was allowed to voice their concerns.
- The objector argued that the proposal was environmentally harmful.
- She became an objector after witnessing the effects of the policy firsthand.
- The council listened carefully to the objector's claims.
- As the sole objector, he felt the weight of responsibility on his shoulders.
- The objector rallied support from like-minded citizens.
- In a surprising turn, the objector changed their stance after new evidence emerged.
- The objector was a member of several advocacy groups.
- Many objectors attended the rally to show their opposition.
- The objector filed a lawsuit against the city.
- The objector emphasized the need for transparency in the decision-making process.
- She was proud to be an objector in the fight for civil rights.
- The objector referenced historical examples to strengthen their argument.
- With her extensive background, the objector was a credible voice in the discussion.
- The objector felt marginalized in the conversation about the new law.
- As an objector, he faced backlash from supporters of the initiative.
- The objector detailed their objections in a letter to the editor.
- The objector highlighted the lack of community input in the proposal.
- The objector was seen as a whistleblower by many in the community.
- The objector focused on the ethical implications of the decision.
- At the public hearing, the objector was given five minutes to speak.
- The objector used data to back up their claims.
- The objector was well-prepared for the debate.
- Many viewed the objector as a hero for speaking out.
- The objector had previously worked in the industry they were opposing.
- The objector’s testimony was crucial in the trial.
- The objector was not afraid to challenge the status quo.
- The objector stood firm despite pressure from colleagues.
- The objector hoped to inspire others to voice their concerns.
- The objector's arguments were met with mixed reactions.
- She identified herself as an objector to the proposed law.
- The objector sought legal counsel to understand their rights.
- The objector organized a petition to gather support.
- As an objector, he knew the importance of being informed.
- The objector spoke at multiple events to raise awareness.
- The objector faced a tough audience but remained composed.
- The objector hoped to bring about meaningful change.
- The objector's voice echoed through the hall.
- Every objector was given the same amount of time to speak.
- The objector felt a moral obligation to act.
- The objector urged others to join their cause.
- The objector found solidarity with like-minded individuals.
- The objector felt that their concerns were being dismissed.
- The objector was eager to engage in constructive dialogue.
- The objector shared personal stories to illustrate their point.
- The objector believed in the power of grassroots movements.
- The objector was deeply passionate about the issue at hand.
- The objector faced intimidation but stood their ground.
- The objector's perspective added depth to the conversation.
- The objector encouraged others to think critically about the issue.
- The objector was recognized for their bravery in speaking out.
- The objector participated in a panel discussion.
- The objector crafted an eloquent speech that resonated with the audience.
- The objector faced scrutiny from the media.
- The objector's stance sparked a larger movement.
- The objector called for accountability from decision-makers.
- The objector was determined to make their voice heard.
- The objector highlighted the risks associated with the proposal.
- The objector was a prominent figure in the community.
- The objector organized a workshop to educate others.
- The objector believed in the importance of activism.
- The objector sought to bridge gaps in understanding.
- The objector felt a sense of duty to advocate for change.
- The objector's arguments were well-researched and compelling.
- The objector faced a challenging uphill battle.
- The objector was an influential voice in the movement.
- The objector utilized social media to spread their message.
- The objector emphasized the need for community involvement.
- The objector remained optimistic despite the challenges.
- The objector inspired others to take action.
- The objector was willing to stand alone for their beliefs.
- The objector sought to raise awareness through art.
- The objector had a profound impact on public opinion.
- The objector believed that change starts with one voice.
- The objector was passionate about environmental sustainability.
- The objector faced resistance but remained steadfast.
- The objector participated in national campaigns.
- The objector was committed to social justice.
- The objector attended rallies to amplify their voice.
- The objector's contributions were invaluable to the cause.
- The objector felt empowered by the support of others.
- The objector was an integral part of the team.
- The objector challenged the narrative presented by the media.
- The objector was prepared for a long fight.
- The objector believed in the power of peaceful protest.
- The objector sought to educate the public on the issues.
- The objector utilized statistics to strengthen their argument.
- The objector understood the importance of persistence.
- The objector was often misunderstood by those who disagreed.
- The objector looked forward to a future where their concerns were addressed.