100 Examples of sentences containing the common noun "prosecution"

Definition

Prosecution (noun) refers to the act of conducting legal proceedings against someone in respect of a criminal charge. It also refers to the body of officials who conduct such proceedings on behalf of the state, typically represented by a prosecutor.

Synonyms

• Legal action
• Litigation
• Trial
• Indictment
• Charge
• Case

Antonyms

• Defense
• Acquittal
• Exoneration
• Release
• Dismissal

Examples

1. The prosecution presented compelling evidence against the defendant.
2. During the trial, the prosecution argued that the suspect had motive and opportunity.
3. The judge ruled in favor of the prosecution's request for a longer sentencing.
4. The prosecution called several witnesses to testify in the case.
5. The prosecution plans to appeal the court's decision.
6. After reviewing the evidence, the prosecution decided to proceed with the case.
7. The prosecution faced criticism for its handling of the evidence.
8. The jury found the prosecution's arguments to be convincing.
9. The prosecution aimed to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
10. The defense attorney challenged the prosecution's interpretation of the law.
11. The prosecution emphasized the severity of the crime during closing arguments.
12. In many cases, the prosecution must provide clear and convincing evidence.
13. The prosecution has the burden of proof in a criminal trial.
14. The prosecution showed a video of the incident as evidence.
15. The prosecution rested its case after calling all its witnesses.
16. The prosecution argued for a maximum sentence due to the nature of the offense.
17. The prosecution was accused of misconduct during the trial.
18. The prosecution and defense presented conflicting narratives of the events.
19. The prosecution relied heavily on forensic evidence to make its case.
20. The prosecution highlighted inconsistencies in the defendant's statements.
21. The prosecution faced unexpected challenges during the trial.
22. The prosecution concluded that there was enough evidence to charge the suspect.
23. The prosecution sought to introduce new evidence late in the trial.
24. The prosecution prepared extensively for the high-profile case.
25. The prosecution called upon experts to support its claims.
26. The prosecution was determined to seek justice for the victims.
27. The prosecution argued that the defendant had a history of similar offenses.
28. The prosecution decided to drop some charges due to lack of evidence.
29. The prosecution faced a tough battle against an experienced defense attorney.
30. The prosecution was pleased with the jury's verdict.
31. The prosecution had to prove intent behind the defendant's actions.
32. The prosecution issued a statement after the verdict was reached.
33. The prosecution was criticized for not pursuing certain leads.
34. The prosecution used DNA evidence to link the suspect to the crime scene.
35. The prosecution argued that the crime was premeditated.
36. The prosecution felt confident going into the closing arguments.
37. The prosecution worked closely with law enforcement during the investigation.
38. The prosecution highlighted the impact of the crime on the community.
39. The prosecution took a firm stance against plea deals in serious cases.
40. The prosecution was accused of overreach in its charges.
41. The prosecution sought to extend the trial due to new evidence.
42. The prosecution had to navigate a complex legal landscape.
43. The prosecution made a strong case for the defendant's guilt.
44. The prosecution was eager to present its case to the jury.
45. The prosecution faced a setback when a key witness failed to appear.
46. The prosecution planned to call character witnesses to testify.
47. The prosecution was satisfied with the outcome of the trial.
48. The prosecution argued that the crime was committed in a premeditated manner.
49. The prosecution requested a gag order to prevent media influence.
50. The prosecution was focused on securing a conviction.
51. The prosecution had a solid strategy for the trial.
52. The prosecution scrutinized the evidence to build a strong case.
53. The prosecution expressed confidence in the jury's decision-making.
54. The prosecution was prepared for a lengthy trial.
55. The prosecution faced significant public scrutiny during the case.
56. The prosecution argued that the evidence was overwhelming.
57. The prosecution was determined to hold the perpetrator accountable.
58. The prosecution often collaborates with investigators to gather evidence.
59. The prosecution had to establish a clear timeline of events.
60. The prosecution provided a detailed account of the crime.
61. The prosecution faced a tough challenge in proving its case.
62. The prosecution was under pressure to deliver justice.
63. The prosecution emphasized the importance of the case during the trial.
64. The prosecution brought in experts to explain complex topics to the jury.
65. The prosecution maintained that the defendant acted with malice aforethought.
66. The prosecution was ready to counter the defense's arguments.
67. The prosecution had a reputation for being tough on crime.
68. The prosecution faced a crucial moment when the jury began deliberating.
69. The prosecution was relieved when the verdict was announced.
70. The prosecution had to adapt its strategy as the trial progressed.
71. The prosecution was disappointed with the leniency of the sentence.
72. The prosecution prepared a detailed memorandum for the judge.
73. The prosecution was strategic in its presentation of evidence.
74. The prosecution expressed concern about jury bias.
75. The prosecution analyzed the defense's claims thoroughly.
76. The prosecution was involved in a high-profile case that gained media attention.
77. The prosecution sought justice for the victims and their families.
78. The prosecution called for a stringent review of the evidence.
79. The prosecution faced delays due to procedural issues.
80. The prosecution had a clear vision for its approach to the trial.
81. The prosecution believed the evidence was compelling and irrefutable.
82. The prosecution was relentless in its pursuit of justice.
83. The prosecution provided the jury with a comprehensive overview of the case.
84. The prosecution faced a significant challenge in proving intent.
85. The prosecution filed motions to exclude certain evidence.
86. The prosecution was prepared for a lengthy legal battle.
87. The prosecution utilized visual aids to support its case.
88. The prosecution had to navigate complex legal arguments.
89. The prosecution emphasized the need for accountability in its arguments.
90. The prosecution had a solid understanding of the legal precedents involved.
91. The prosecution was determined to present a case that left no doubt.
92. The prosecution faced allegations of bias from the defense.
93. The prosecution aimed to ensure that justice was served.
94. The prosecution had to contend with unexpected developments during the trial.
95. The prosecution carefully selected its witnesses for maximum impact.
96. The prosecution was committed to upholding the rule of law.
97. The prosecution felt confident about its chances of securing a conviction.
98. The prosecution sought to clarify the legal definitions for the jury.
99. The prosecution was focused on the facts of the case.
100. The prosecution was ready to present its final arguments to the jury.