100 Examples of sentences containing the common noun "randomisation"
Definition
Randomisation refers to the process of making something random or the act of assigning subjects in a study to different groups in a way that is determined by chance. It is commonly used in research to eliminate bias and ensure that results are statistically valid.
Synonyms
- Random assignment
- Random selection
- Random sampling
- Chance assignment
Antonyms
- Systematic selection
- Deliberate assignment
- Fixed allocation
- Non-random assignment
Examples
- The study's integrity relied on the randomisation of participants.
- Researchers emphasized the importance of randomisation in clinical trials.
- Proper randomisation can help reduce bias in research outcomes.
- The randomisation process was carefully monitored to ensure fairness.
- Randomisation is crucial for achieving valid results in experiments.
- They implemented randomisation to enhance the credibility of their findings.
- The researchers discussed the challenges of randomisation in their methodology.
- Statistical software was used for the randomisation of subjects.
- In this study, randomisation played a key role in data analysis.
- The randomisation of samples is essential for unbiased results.
- Randomisation helps in balancing confounding variables in experiments.
- The team employed randomisation techniques to strengthen their study.
- Effective randomisation can lead to more reliable conclusions.
- The researchers highlighted the significance of randomisation in their work.
- They faced difficulties during the randomisation phase of the trial.
- The randomisation of groups is a standard practice in research.
- Ethical considerations were taken into account during the randomisation process.
- The success of the trial depended on proper randomisation.
- Randomisation can improve the generalizability of study findings.
- The researchers conducted a thorough review of their randomisation methods.
- Randomisation reduces the risk of selection bias in studies.
- They discussed the limitations of their randomisation approach.
- The randomisation protocol was approved by the ethics committee.
- The study utilized randomisation to allocate treatments effectively.
- Randomisation ensures that each participant has an equal chance of selection.
- The validity of the results was enhanced by randomisation.
- The team reported their findings after completing the randomisation process.
- Randomisation is a fundamental principle in experimental design.
- The implementation of randomisation was challenging in this context.
- The researchers were pleased with the outcomes of their randomisation strategy.
- They provided a detailed explanation of their randomisation method.
- Randomisation was achieved through the use of computer algorithms.
- The randomisation of control and experimental groups was vital for the study.
- The researchers faced ethical dilemmas during the randomisation phase.
- They conducted a pilot study to test their randomisation procedures.
- The randomisation process was transparent and well-documented.
- Researchers often discuss randomisation in terms of its statistical significance.
- The importance of randomisation cannot be overstated in clinical research.
- They conducted extensive training on randomisation techniques for the staff.
- The data analysis relied heavily on the principles of randomisation.
- Randomisation allowed for unexpected results to emerge in the study.
- The researchers ensured the randomisation was strictly adhered to in the trial.
- Randomisation can sometimes be overlooked in smaller studies.
- The randomisation of participants was done using a lottery system.
- Their findings were validated by the thorough randomisation process.
- The randomisation strategy was deemed innovative by the peer reviewers.
- They published a paper on the effects of randomisation in social sciences.
- The team assessed the effectiveness of their randomisation approach.
- Randomisation is often confused with random sampling, but they are distinct.
- The researchers used stratified randomisation to ensure diversity.
- The success of the trial hinged on effective randomisation techniques.
- The randomisation of variables was a key focus in their analysis.
- Ethical guidelines were established for the randomisation process.
- Their results suggested that randomisation improved participant engagement.
- The randomisation method was a topic of discussion in the conference.
- They sought to improve their randomisation procedures based on feedback.
- The randomisation results were statistically analyzed for significance.
- Participants were informed about the randomisation process beforehand.
- The researchers encountered obstacles during the randomisation phase.
- The study was praised for its rigorous randomisation methods.
- Randomisation can help control for variables that may skew results.
- They provided a detailed account of their randomisation challenges.
- The randomisation process was automated to enhance efficiency.
- Researchers debated the merits of their randomisation design.
- The team conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate randomisation impacts.
- The randomisation of groups was conducted in a double-blind manner.
- They examined the long-term effects of randomisation in their research.
- The integrity of the study was upheld by thorough randomisation.
- Training sessions focused on the principles of randomisation.
- The randomisation method was well-received in the academic community.
- The researchers published their findings on the effectiveness of randomisation.
- Their approach to randomisation was innovative and groundbreaking.
- The results indicated that randomisation led to more accurate outcomes.
- They used a comprehensive review to refine their randomisation strategy.
- The randomisation process was integral to the study's methodology.
- They highlighted the role of randomisation in reducing confounding factors.
- Researchers must ensure that randomisation is correctly implemented.
- The randomisation protocol was standardized across all trials.
- Participants were randomly assigned through a process of randomisation.
- The team noted the challenges of implementing randomisation in large studies.
- Randomisation is a critical step in experimental research design.
- The researchers shared their insights on randomisation at the symposium.
- The randomisation of the control group was crucial for comparison.
- They analyzed the impact of randomisation on participant retention.
- The randomisation process was documented for transparency.
- A chart was created to illustrate the steps of randomisation.
- The study's findings were influenced by the methods of randomisation.
- They conducted a workshop focused on the principles of randomisation.
- The randomisation approach was adaptable to various study designs.
- The researchers faced scrutiny regarding their randomisation methods.
- The randomisation of participants was essential for the trial's success.
- They considered alternative methods of randomisation for future studies.
- The randomisation process was overseen by an independent committee.
- The team emphasized the importance of adhering to randomisation guidelines.
- They reported significant findings that stemmed from effective randomisation.
- The researchers utilized advanced techniques for randomisation.
- The randomisation procedures were audited for compliance.
- The impact of randomisation on outcomes was discussed in the findings.
- They evaluated the effectiveness of their randomisation strategy regularly.
- The results reinforced the value of randomisation in research design.