100 Examples of sentences containing the common noun "zemstvo"
Definition
Zemstvo refers to a form of local self-government that was established in the Russian Empire in the 19th century. It was primarily responsible for managing local affairs such as education, public health, and infrastructure. Zemstvos were elected assemblies that allowed for some degree of local autonomy and were composed of representatives from different social classes.
Synonyms
- Local government
- Regional council
- Municipal council
- District assembly
Antonyms
- Central government
- Federal authority
- National administration
Examples
- The Zemstvo was instrumental in improving rural education in its region.
- Many local issues were addressed by the Zemstvo in the late 1800s.
- The Zemstvo system allowed for greater participation from the peasantry.
- In rural areas, the Zemstvo managed agricultural initiatives effectively.
- The Zemstvo played a crucial role during the reforms of Tsar Alexander II.
- Villagers often turned to the Zemstvo for assistance with health care.
- The establishment of the Zemstvo was a significant development in local governance.
- Women began to take part in the Zemstvo elections in the early 20th century.
- The Zemstvo focused on building better roads and transportation networks.
- Activists sought to reform the Zemstvo to increase its powers.
- The Zemstvo was often challenged by the central government’s authority.
- Local elections for the Zemstvo created a sense of community involvement.
- Advocates praised the Zemstvo for its contributions to public health.
- The Zemstvo system was unique to the Russian Empire during its time.
- Farmers often voiced their concerns at Zemstvo meetings.
- The Zemstvo facilitated communication between the government and the populace.
- Critics argued that the Zemstvo did not have enough funding to be effective.
- Historical documents shed light on the workings of the Zemstvo.
- The Zemstvo was a precursor to modern local governments in Russia.
- Reformers aimed to enhance the authority of the Zemstvo in the early 1900s.
- The Zemstvo faced resistance from those who preferred central control.
- Educational reforms initiated by the Zemstvo were groundbreaking at the time.
- The Zemstvo provided a platform for local leaders to emerge.
- Many policies introduced by the Zemstvo were later adopted nationally.
- The Zemstvo served as a model for other countries looking to implement local governance.
- During its existence, the Zemstvo grappled with issues of representation.
- The Zemstvo met regularly to discuss pressing local matters.
- Citizens often felt more connected to their Zemstvo than to the national government.
- The Zemstvo was dissolved during the Soviet era, which centralized power.
- Members of the Zemstvo were elected based on local land ownership criteria.
- The Zemstvo had its own budget and financial responsibilities.
- Community projects often received funding from the Zemstvo.
- The Zemstvo allowed for a degree of self-determination in local governance.
- Many historians study the Zemstvo to understand pre-revolutionary Russia.
- The Zemstvo was often a source of innovation in local policies.
- Local artisans and tradespeople benefited from Zemstvo initiatives.
- The Zemstvo was critical in addressing rural poverty issues.
- Citizens were encouraged to participate in the Zemstvo deliberations.
- The Zemstvo provided essential services that the central government overlooked.
- Many reforms proposed by the Zemstvo were aimed at social welfare.
- The Zemstvo contributed to the gradual modernization of rural Russia.
- Local leaders often held significant influence within the Zemstvo.
- Farmers organized to lobby their Zemstvo representatives for better policies.
- The reach of the Zemstvo extended to various aspects of daily life.
- The Zemstvo faced challenges in balancing local and central interests.
- Many Zemstvo officials were educated and reform-minded.
- The Zemstvo became a breeding ground for political activism.
- Local elections for the Zemstvo were held every three years.
- The Zemstvo was a key player in the development of rural infrastructure.
- The Zemstvo assemblies were often contentious and lively.
- The Zemstvo provided a voice for the marginalized in society.
- Urban areas had different Zemstvo structures compared to rural ones.
- The Zemstvo was often seen as a compromise between autocracy and democracy.
- Many sought to increase the powers of the Zemstvo during the reform era.
- The effectiveness of the Zemstvo varied greatly between regions.
- The Zemstvo was responsible for disaster relief efforts in local areas.
- Some viewed the Zemstvo as a threat to the traditional power structure.
- Local schools were established under the guidance of the Zemstvo.
- The Zemstvo was a key institute in promoting local culture and identity.
- The Zemstvo faced criticism for being slow to respond to urgent needs.
- Many local leaders emerged from the ranks of the Zemstvo.
- The Zemstvo influenced local law enforcement policies.
- The Zemstvo was an important part of the political landscape in the 19th century.
- Reform movements often utilized the Zemstvo as a platform for change.
- The Zemstvo helped standardize educational practices across regions.
- Many people relied on the Zemstvo for agricultural advice and support.
- The Zemstvo system allowed for experimentation in governance.
- The Zemstvo was instrumental in fostering local economic development.
- Local artisans often showcased their work through Zemstvo exhibitions.
- The Zemstvo was a conduit for political ideas and reforms.
- Many communities rallied around their Zemstvo representatives.
- The Zemstvo was often caught between local needs and central mandates.
- The Zemstvo addressed sanitation issues in rural areas.
- Some Zemstvo assemblies were more progressive than others.
- The Zemstvo structure was influenced by earlier local governance models.
- The Zemstvo saw a rise in participation from minority groups during its tenure.
- The Zemstvo was a significant step towards democratization in Russia.
- Many Zemstvo officials were passionate about social reform.
- The Zemstvo was challenged by economic constraints and limited resources.
- The Zemstvo provided a framework for local taxation and budget allocation.
- The Zemstvo played a role in the promotion of public health campaigns.
- Many reforms initiated by the Zemstvo were met with local resistance.
- The Zemstvo was a unique feature of Russian governance.
- The Zemstvo often collaborated with local NGOs for community projects.
- The Zemstvo was a focal point for discussions about local governance.
- Many saw the Zemstvo as a way to enhance local democracy.
- The Zemstvo faced scrutiny from both local citizens and central authorities.
- The Zemstvo contributed to the development of local infrastructure.
- Many policies proposed by the Zemstvo focused on improving agricultural practices.
- The Zemstvo helped mediate conflicts between different community groups.
- The Zemstvo was seen as a vital institution in the pre-revolutionary landscape.
- The Zemstvo provided essential services that were otherwise lacking.
- The Zemstvo often dealt with issues of land distribution and ownership.
- Many local leaders were trained in governance through their experience in the Zemstvo.
- The Zemstvo was a place where local voices could be heard.
- Some Zemstvo officials became prominent political figures later in life.
- The Zemstvo was characterized by its focus on local needs and issues.
- The Zemstvo revolutionized the way rural communities organized themselves.
- Many viewed the Zemstvo as a step towards a more representative government.
- The legacy of the Zemstvo continues to influence local governance in Russia today.